Supersession register — which order replaces which

Rajasthan ULB General Election 2026 · for the DLMT · only the latest order is in force

Why this file. Superseded orders are still listed on the Commission's website. Anyone can open the Statutory_Orders page, download an old order, and assume it applies. They would be wrong.

🔴 Proof (checked first-hand 23.08.2026): the Commission's Statutory_Orders page still shows notification 2469 dated 28.07.2025 as "Notification of symbol, Ward Member 2025" — although notification 4178 dated 17.10.2025 expressly supersedes it.

Every line below was read from the superseding order's own text — not inferred.

🚨 The first rule

The later order governs — and the supersession sentence is written inside that order.

Before taking any order into training, read its opening paragraph — that is where "…superseding order no. …" appears.

Part 1 — 🔴 Superseded orders · never teach these

🔴 The symbols line — the biggest trap

The own text of notification 4178 dated 17.10.2025 (Compendium, order 34, printed p. 124 — read first-hand):

"… superseding its earlier notification no. 1516 dated 02.05.2019, amended notification no. 3888 dated 07.10.2019, notification no. 1903 dated 24.05.2023, notification no. 1439 dated 06.05.2025 and notification no. 2469 dated 28.07.2025, issues the following order…"

🚨 And yet the Commission's Statutory_Orders page still displays 2469 today. ➡ For symbols, look only at 4178. → मतपत्रों का मुद्रण — ईवीएम मतपत्र, निविदत्त मतपत्र एवं डाक मतपत्र

Part 2 — ✅ NOT superseded (checked and confirmed — these are in force)

🚨 The reasoning behind Part 2 — understand this

Treating a pre-2026 order as in force is not my inference. One of two things must be true —

Basis	Examples
(a) the Commission reprinted it in its own Compendium for this election	4056 · 4297 · 1670
(b) a 2026 order sent it as an enclosure	6769 (with order 4187)

⚠️ If neither holds, do not take a pre-2026 order into training — confirm with the DEO first.

Part 3 — ⚠️ What looks like supersession but is not

🔴 The Annexure-16 line matters most. Being printed in the Margdarsika ≠ being in force. The Margdarsika was printed on a date; orders issued after it override it.

Part 4 — 🔴 Documents the Commission still serves that are out of date

The website is a library, not a statement of what is in force. Nothing is withdrawn when it is superseded. Every item below was downloaded first-hand on 22–23.08.2026 from the live site.

🔴 The expenditure-limit line is the newest instance of the same trap

A candidate's agent checking "what may I spend?" would land on 4237 from the Commission's own listing and get a 2019 figure. Order 5041 dated 23.12.2025 replaced it — and 5041 is what our material already teaches. Note also that 5041, though issued in 2025, still gives itself the short title "…Order, 2019" — a drafting carry-over, not a defect of substance.

🚨 The FAQ is the most dangerous of the three

A candidate or a new RO looking for a plain-language answer will open the FAQ first. Every authority it relies on is dated 2019 or earlier — I checked every date in all 28 pages. ✅ Our material is already ahead of it on every point. The deposit figures agree (President ₹20,000/₹10,000 · Chairman ₹10,000/₹5,000); the two dead requirements do not. ➡ If anyone quotes the FAQ at you, ask for the order behind the sentence. Held for reference at Other_Documents/SEC_FAQ_municipal_elections_2019vintage.pdf.

🚨 A three-step check before any training

Compiled: 23.08.2026 · every supersession line read from the superseding order's own text Hindi parallel: अधिक्रमण रजिस्टर — कौन-सा आदेश किसे हटाता है Related: ⛔ नवीनतम आदेश — जो मार्गदर्शिका और संकलन दोनों पर भारी पड़ते हैं · Stale and defective citations in the official sources — a single register · DLMT Training Material — Correction Sheet · बालोतरा जिला — प्रशिक्षण पैक